Comments on: Sparkling feedback on #wbc10 blog influence rank- The sequel

By: Yann Ropars

Yann Ropars — Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:42:51 +0000

Thanks for the feedback Rick. Studying those takes indeed a good amount of time and we tried to be as thorough as possible with our method. Who is on it and who shouldn’t is part of the method is really what it comes down to. We do this looking an objective measure. It’s always fascinating to have the community look through this and see if it fits their understanding of influence. We of course can’t point out if someone has more expertise in different types of wines or other topic but it may move substantially the list. What are your top conferences beside WBC? Fancy Food show?

By: Rick Bakas

Rick Bakas — Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:58:49 +0000

Thanks for the feedback and follow up post. It wasn’t so much about “i want to be on the list” or “Bean should be on the list”. It was more about accuracy of the data provided.

If you post a list like that (which is a good idea) it can be a useful tool, especially when there’s an accurate representation of info. I just want to know how useful that list is if it’s missing people. Who else is missing from it? Who’s on the list, but shouldn’t be? That sort of thing.

Cheers

By: Under the Influence?? The 25 Most Influential Wine Bloggers going to Walla Walla #WBC10 « Extanz – PR 2.0 and Inbound Marketing

Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:23:18 +0000

[...] Rick, see the sequel blog – look forward to your feedback. Thanks http://extanz.com/2010/07/13/sparkling-feedback-on-wbc10-blog-influence-rank-the-sequel/ [...]