<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I read your twit, therefore I [and you] exist.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://extanz.com/2008/10/08/i-read-your-twit-therefore-i-and-you-exist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://extanz.com/2008/10/08/i-read-your-twit-therefore-i-and-you-exist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:15:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walker Thompson</title>
		<link>http://extanz.com/2008/10/08/i-read-your-twit-therefore-i-and-you-exist/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walker Thompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extanz.wordpress.com/?p=398#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post... I&#039;m new to the TWEET. I think the action of twitter is great, but I don&#039;t like to use it just in Twitter alone. I think the best interaction of tweets occurs on Facebook, LinkedIN, etc. Basically, tweets works best in a larger network...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post&#8230; I&#8217;m new to the TWEET. I think the action of twitter is great, but I don&#8217;t like to use it just in Twitter alone. I think the best interaction of tweets occurs on Facebook, LinkedIN, etc. Basically, tweets works best in a larger network&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://extanz.com/2008/10/08/i-read-your-twit-therefore-i-and-you-exist/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extanz.wordpress.com/?p=398#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah ha!

I wondered if that might be the case....

In any event, a well-written post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah ha!</p>
<p>I wondered if that might be the case&#8230;.</p>
<p>In any event, a well-written post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsten Broadfoot</title>
		<link>http://extanz.com/2008/10/08/i-read-your-twit-therefore-i-and-you-exist/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirsten Broadfoot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extanz.wordpress.com/?p=398#comment-28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jared,

Thanks so much for your comment! You are indeed correct, and actually, I was being deliberate in my use of the word &#039;twit&#039; as per its dictionary definition as you pointed out. It was tongue in cheek :) 

I grew up in  a place where people were regularly called &#039;twits&#039; and so I have always been culturally amused by this phenomenon.  In fact, to &#039;twitter about&#039; where I come from, is to spend your time frivolously on meaningless activities....

Maybe you are right..... a new definition would be good....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jared,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for your comment! You are indeed correct, and actually, I was being deliberate in my use of the word &#8216;twit&#8217; as per its dictionary definition as you pointed out. It was tongue in cheek <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I grew up in  a place where people were regularly called &#8216;twits&#8217; and so I have always been culturally amused by this phenomenon.  In fact, to &#8216;twitter about&#8217; where I come from, is to spend your time frivolously on meaningless activities&#8230;.</p>
<p>Maybe you are right&#8230;.. a new definition would be good&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://extanz.com/2008/10/08/i-read-your-twit-therefore-i-and-you-exist/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extanz.wordpress.com/?p=398#comment-27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick clarification....

&quot;Twit&quot; isn&#039;t the correct usage here. 

To &quot;twit&quot; is defined by Merriam-Webster as:
1  : to subject to light ridicule or reproach 
2  : to make fun of as a fault

To &quot;twitter&quot; is (definition again from m-w):
intransitive verb
1: to utter successive chirping noises
2 a: to talk in a chattering fashion b: giggle  , titter3: to tremble with agitation : flutter
transitive verb
1: to utter in chirps or twitters 
2: to shake rapidly back and forth : flutter

In this case, I believe the correct usage would be &quot;twitter&quot;, using the intransitive 2a definition from above, when using the word as a verb.

When using it as a noun, you should most assuredly use &quot;tweet&quot;, not &quot;twit&quot;.

I have seen &quot;tweet&quot; used online as a verb to describe the act of posting on Twitter.  However, &quot;tweet&quot; is only officially defined as a noun.  

Perhaps we will see a new definition in the future?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick clarification&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Twit&#8221; isn&#8217;t the correct usage here. </p>
<p>To &#8220;twit&#8221; is defined by Merriam-Webster as:<br />
1  : to subject to light ridicule or reproach<br />
2  : to make fun of as a fault</p>
<p>To &#8220;twitter&#8221; is (definition again from m-w):<br />
intransitive verb<br />
1: to utter successive chirping noises<br />
2 a: to talk in a chattering fashion b: giggle  , titter3: to tremble with agitation : flutter<br />
transitive verb<br />
1: to utter in chirps or twitters<br />
2: to shake rapidly back and forth : flutter</p>
<p>In this case, I believe the correct usage would be &#8220;twitter&#8221;, using the intransitive 2a definition from above, when using the word as a verb.</p>
<p>When using it as a noun, you should most assuredly use &#8220;tweet&#8221;, not &#8220;twit&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have seen &#8220;tweet&#8221; used online as a verb to describe the act of posting on Twitter.  However, &#8220;tweet&#8221; is only officially defined as a noun.  </p>
<p>Perhaps we will see a new definition in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

